




|
On the Absence of Light
To define something to be 'dark', or 'black' as we sometimes
call it, we must first define colour and several other substances
and irregularities.
Colour is in its simple definition our minds manifestation of
the light waves reflected by an object. Whether we see something
as red or green, depends on the objects refreaction of light.
Matter is anything which we can see, touch, or manipulate. Therefore,
a rock is matter because we can touch it, also because we can
see it, and water is matter because we can see, touch, and manipulate
it, ie change its form without exherting force.
Air, however, is an irregularity, as is 'space', and to an extent,
atoms, protons and neutrons. They dont fit to be matter, because
we cant see or touch them, but we know they exist because they
fit observations and equations. We can call such substances 'Nequid'.
An object of matter which we can see through but cannot see itself
is an Aquoid
Nequid allows the passing of light waves but does not reflect
them hence we cannot see nequid.
Matter reflects light which allows us to see it. Water is a special
case in which it allows us to see through it as well as it being
matter and not a nequid. Although we cant actually see it, we
can see through it, which makes it an aquoid. Glass is the same.
We cannot state that aquoids are devoid of colour, for that would
mean that it would not reflect light. For something to be absent
of light, the following would be true:
An object devoid of light would have no colour, we would not
be able to see it, it would be composed of matter, and because
it was an absence of light we would not be able to see it as
we see things based on the reflection of light and as there is
none in this case it would not be visable. But that doesnt make
it invisable or impossible, and it would still contain mass to
the same variability as objects in the universe ie it would come
in all shapes and sizes. Because it doesnt reflect light, we
have to assume it absorbs light, and therefore the line of sight
around the object would be impered, perhaps making the object
seem larger, if we could see it that is.
As the object 'swallows' light, we can also assume it grows in
mass, because no light is emitted again. this would essentially
make the object an inverted sun, or one definition of a black
hole.
Another point is that if the common definition of black as being
the absence of all light were true, then we would be in trouble
because the earth would be full of inverted stars. This however
is not the case. Our definition of black and the colour black
differ, and using the above definition of a colour, we can safely
assertain that black, as well as white, is in fact a colour.
Some artistic views would point it to be a tone rather that a
colour, but technically, as proved above, it must in fact be
a colour.
|
|
Contents
- Maori Myths & Legends
- For the Glory of Rome
- The Sanity of Professor R.J. Basil Part
One, Two, Three
- The Trials of Archibald Henderson
of Windsor
- Convergere
- Other
|